- Your selection
- Clear all
- Banking x
- Asia x
- Strategy x
9 case(s) found.
With a focus on China’s biggest internet companies, Alibaba and Tencent, the case study describes their respective histories, fintech subsidiaries and platform-based ecosystems.
-
Reference 6588
-
Published 22 Jul 2020
-
Length 35 page(s)
-
Topic Strategy
-
Region Asia
-
Industry Financial Services, Internet, Banking
With a focus on China’s biggest internet companies, Alibaba and Tencent, the case study describes their respective histories, fintech subsidiaries and platform-based ecosystems.
In the midst of IndonesiaÂ’s financial and economic crisis, Bank Mandiri was formed on October 2, 1998 as a holding company for four state banks. Like most other banks in Indonesia during the Asian financial crisis, these four banks were insolvent.
In the midst of IndonesiaÂ’s financial and economic crisis, Bank Mandiri was formed on October 2, 1998 as a holding company for four state banks. Like most other banks in Indonesia during the Asian financial crisis, these four banks were insolvent.
In the midst of Indonesia’s financial and economic crisis, Bank Mandiri was formed on October 2, 1998 as a holding company for four state banks. Like most other banks in Indonesia during the Asian financial crisis, these four banks were insolvent.
In the midst of Indonesia’s financial and economic crisis, Bank Mandiri was formed on October 2, 1998 as a holding company for four state banks. Like most other banks in Indonesia during the Asian financial crisis, these four banks were insolvent.
In the midst of Indonesia’s financial and economic crisis, Bank Mandiri was formed on October 2, 1998 as a holding company for four state banks. Like most other banks in Indonesia during the Asian financial crisis, these four banks were insolvent.
In the midst of Indonesia’s financial and economic crisis, Bank Mandiri was formed on October 2, 1998 as a holding company for four state banks. Like most other banks in Indonesia during the Asian financial crisis, these four banks were insolvent.
In the midst of Indonesia’s financial and economic crisis, Bank Mandiri was formed on October 2, 1998 as a holding company for four state banks. Like most other banks in Indonesia during the Asian financial crisis, these four banks were insolvent.
In the midst of Indonesia’s financial and economic crisis, Bank Mandiri was formed on October 2, 1998 as a holding company for four state banks. Like most other banks in Indonesia during the Asian financial crisis, these four banks were insolvent.
In the midst of Indonesia’s financial and economic crisis, Bank Mandiri was formed on October 2, 1998 as a holding company for four state banks. Like most other banks in Indonesia during the Asian financial crisis, these four banks were insolvent.
In the midst of Indonesia’s financial and economic crisis, Bank Mandiri was formed on October 2, 1998 as a holding company for four state banks. Like most other banks in Indonesia during the Asian financial crisis, these four banks were insolvent.
The case focuses on the US-China bilateral negotiations on ChinaÂ’s bid for WTO membership. It presents the domestic policy processes of both countries regarding the entry negotiation and indicates the likely impact of ChinaÂ’s entry.
The case focuses on the US-China bilateral negotiations on ChinaÂ’s bid for WTO membership. It presents the domestic policy processes of both countries regarding the entry negotiation and indicates the likely impact of ChinaÂ’s entry.
The case presents the evolution of the banking system in China in the 1990s, but dating back to 1978.
The case presents the evolution of the banking system in China in the 1990s, but dating back to 1978.
GITIC was forced to closure in 1998/99, creating concern among foreign investors, particularly Japanese and Korean. The concern was that the Chinese government would not stand behind its own store investment bank. The case is about how to read economic policy-making in a non-transparent environment.
GITIC was forced to closure in 1998/99, creating concern among foreign investors, particularly Japanese and Korean. The concern was that the Chinese government would not stand behind its own store investment bank. The case is about how to read economic policy-making in a non-transparent environment.