Case A presents three strategic options considered by a fictitious international oil and gas corporation to address the issue of climate change: "fight against action", "wait and see", and "dynamic proactive".
Case B presents the climate change strategies of three multinational corporations – ExxonMobil, BP Amoco, and TotalFinaElf.
Case A presents three strategic options considered by a fictitious international oil and gas corporation to address the issue of climate change: "fight against action", "wait and see", and "dynamic proactive".
Case B presents the climate change strategies of three multinational corporations – ExxonMobil, BP Amoco, and TotalFinaElf.
Case A presents three strategic options considered by a fictitious international oil and gas corporation to address the issue of climate change: "fight against action", "wait and see", and "dynamic proactive".
Case B presents the climate change strategies of three multinational corporations – ExxonMobil, BP Amoco, and TotalFinaElf.
Case A presents three strategic options considered by a fictitious international oil and gas corporation to address the issue of climate change: "fight against action", "wait and see", and "dynamic proactive".
Case B presents the climate change strategies of three multinational corporations – ExxonMobil, BP Amoco, and TotalFinaElf.
Case A: Presents three strategic options considered by a fictitious international oil and gas corporation to address the issue of climate change: fight against action, wait and see, and dynamic proactive.
Case A: Presents three strategic options considered by a fictitious international oil and gas corporation to address the issue of climate change: fight against action, wait and see, and dynamic proactive.